The "Pallister Pass" Out of Jail or Charges http://johnturmel.com/pallpass.txt Sfetkopoulos Crown Attorney Sean Gaudet to SCC: "[33] The Court in R. v. J.P. ruled that the combined effect of Parker and Hitzig meant there was no constitutionally valid marijuana possession offence between July 31 2001 and Oct 7 2003, the date the MMAR were constitutionally rectified by the decision in Hitzig. Courts may construe the Federal Court of Appeal's decision as creating a similar period of retrospective invalidity dating back to December 3 2003, the date that s.41(b.1) was re-introduced into the MMAR." Pallister Crown Attorney Kevin Wilson to SCO: "20. In express response to Sfetkopoulos paragraph 41(b.1) of the MMAR was amended Effective May 14 2009 to permit the holder of a production licence to grow for up to two ATP-holders. Although Sfetkopoulos determined that the pre-amendment regime was constitutionally defective, it necessarily has made no such determination with respect to the post-amendment regime. As the offence date of the Applicant's charges is October 2 2009, the alleged offences took place under the post-amendment regime. The MMAR were amended before the Applicant's alleged offence." People facing charges during the Pallister Period of prohibition invalidity before Flaw 41 in the MMAR found by Sfetkopoulos was fixed on May 14 2009 can hand in Kevin Wilson's admission and point out but they were charged before the Sfetkopoulos Flaw 41 was fixed. John 'The MedPot Engineer' Turmel http://johnturmel.com